“Eugenics is the self-direction of human evolution”: Like a tree, Eugenics draws its materials from many sources and organizes them into an harmonious entity”
Eu = good/ well/ true and the suffix -genēs =born, origin.
Galton – the scientist that coined such concept – defined eugenics as “the study of all agencies under human control which can improve or impair the racial quality of future generations.”
Within the research on this topic I find that eugenics is expedient in terms of it being something convenient and practical although possibly ‘improper’ or ‘immoral.’ This is where science and its aim to support the creation of a better life – in this case at a genetic level – has confronted the moral, ethical and religious aspects that consider eugenics as ‘human right violations’ – as if such human rights had ever existed/ taken into consideration in the first place.
There is an entire set of prejudices based on this being ‘selective’ as in discriminating, racist and/or elitist – yet not taking into consideration the practical aspects of what would actually mean generating human beings that are well suited to live
The point that is often debated upon is identifying and creating a consensus on what can be defined as ‘defects’ which may still lie within the current morals of a society that wants to keep its feet around cultural values, heritage and any form of racial pride.
Because the ‘choice’ on ‘what is a defect and what’s not’ is the problem, we remove – a.k.a. deprogram through common sense – the values given to culture, racial or hereditary traits and focus on seeing what will be the best for a human being to live with a well equipped functional human physical body.
We already have the ability to step on this scientific aspects of our creation – yet it is most likely held secret due to the controversy around it for ages throughout human history.
Therefore, Science should not mix with morals and ethics – there is only one moral and ethical approach: What’s best for ALL
How to make it acceptable as the way to go for humanity?
Through deprogramming any assigned values to our current culture or race or any type of consideration that is more linked to the creation of such cultures/ races as separation of course, seeking supremacy and/or subjugating those that are ‘less fit’ which is one of the aspects that are currently being used by people in power to ensure that unsuitable DNA-mixing is propagated which will create less-fit human beings.
Within this we go to the point of natural selection wherein the survival of the fittest is the law of prevalence of living beings in this earthly context. This is existent not only at a physical level but to the extent of keeping bloodlines in tact for the purpose of preserving power and control within certain societies.
Positive and negative eugenics aim at the reproduction among the genetically advantages and lowering the fertility among the genetically disadvantage – all of this has been linked to Nazism and Socialism as well as Social Darwinism in the past, we are here to redefine it as common sense and equal life eugenics.
Plato was the one that initially promoted that human reproduction should be controlled/monitored by the state, as well as the creation of beings with compatible DNA that would enhance the qualities of a human being. Yet the overall best for all point was also missed and failed to aim at a general well beingness, remaining then as another form of seeking for supremacist ideals.
Pros and Cons?
What could be ‘reduced’ in terms of being able to modify/ control the creation of a new being? Illnesses, genetic disorders that cause certain emotional/ feeling patterns that have been transmitted through the DNA itself as well as The question is:
Is it possible to create such a tabula rasa for people on Earth? It would be playing ‘god’ certainly, though a god that will no longer have fucked up creations such as malformation and diseases that are virtually incurable yet hampering beings for their entire ‘lifetime’.
We are aware the the idea of ‘playing god’ is quite ingrained within human beings – here I place a perspective on this point:
“Every single human being is in fact doing so / living so “playing god” – can be seen in our direct-interaction with nature/world/animal-kingdom as though we have “control” over ourselves/ our lives / existence – when it’s in fact been the system/money. So – any person that ‘frowns upon’ that statement – actually doing it themselves already”-
If we take this into action, it would not be within the context of creating a ‘superior’ being above ‘others,’ but as an overall self- perfecting process to create an integral being at a physical and mental level. This could drop some jaws initially, but it is in essence how we can make sure that human beings can prevail, only through becoming literal reliable beings that is well suited to live in this world and act according to the rules that the the world has placed and NOT the other way around.
Dysgenics (also known as cacogenics) is the study of factors producing the accumulation and perpetuation of defective or disadvantageous genes and traits in offspring of a particular population or species.
The ‘cons’ are more linked to personal prejudices and freechoice beliefs around our ability to co-create fellow living beings.
People have tagged eugenics as violating ‘human rights’ – as if there were ANY that are being supported currently – because it classified people according to certain dysfunctions – ludicrous since we classify, tag and often denigrate ourselves through such names and classifications mostly linked to money and racial connotations in this specific case. Some are clearly the result of an unequal world such as the categorized ‘poor’ or ‘developmentally disabled’ which can be a cause of simply not having access to proper education.
Being blind, deaf, mentally ill, down syndrome and having any other congenital severe disorder that tampers the ability to live here are aspects that we would not want to live in/as placing ourselves in the shoes of someone that experiences such conditions for life. Therefore if we see the common sense of preventing its propagation and actual correction then why not supporting eugenics? It’s a definitive crime to allow beings to come into this world with such caps to actually live.
The fact that eugenics is usually satanized through linking it with other ‘evil avatars’ such as Hitler is an example of how indoctrinated we are to not see the common sense that eugenics proposes. The general belief that eugenics is ‘bad’ is just that, nothing else but a belief where actual DNA degradation is disregarded and not informed on the detrimental consequences that this process propitiates.
What’s Best for ALL is crystal clear
Just picture this, what is ‘more evil:’ allowing a mentally ill man to rape a woman and bring a child that is the product of a mentally- driven act of rape/ abuse on to another or cap his seminal tubes for life to be mentally-ill free? I vote for the second one.
Advocating this point can lead us once again to a known-link which is Hitler. The sterilization of ‘defectives’ was in his book Mein Kampf and as such it was regarded as ‘evil.’ – I have no problem at all with that either
I am a firm supporter of that which will ensure that no abuse is ever allowed again to bring kids into this world that will have no quality living due to being kept alive for the sake of any moral or ethical value attached to a ‘life’ that has no ability to ‘live’ in self-sufficient manners. I have no preference but supporting that which is best for all, above all personal regard to it which is basically non existent on this topic as common sense is clear enough.
Andrew Gable said on this point: spreading your seed that is genetically misinformed about reality is a crime against humanity and a statement that one is not for what is best for all
If we look at what’s best for all, the only reason that we would prevent a suitable creation of a human being at a genomic level would be having a particular sentimentalism or preferences for certain races linked to cultures/ languages, all programs that were deliberately created to have the current inequality we have. This does not consider the creation of a suitable being to live and develop in this reality, it’s only considering the satisfaction of emotional values attached to the point of ‘creation,’ among the rest of social prejudices that ensure you acceptance and recognition as ‘fulfilled or established’ within the system once that another being is brought into this world by the effect of such seeds.
Allowing the freechoice exerted through random matches without considering the actual offspring of such DNA mix is in fact a crime against life as physical-genomic compatibility is not taken into consideration.
“Within an Equality system, the mixing of DNA will have far less polluting effects as we will manage the consequence and correct it–only where the effect will be physically limiting or mentally limiting will we intervene” –Bernard Poolman
To conclude – we have to educate ourselves first to step out of the usual prejudices propagated by our so-called current education and media – which is the second school – and establish common sense as the measuring points for everything that is here. This implies becoming aware of the entire process that implies bringing another life into this world, not only at a physical level but at an overall mind and body entity that will contain the points carried out by the progenitors. We’ll be able to work with the consequences as long as there are proper corrections.
In the future this point will be part of the consideration of even thinking about bringing another living being into this world, wherein the single decision to procreate will entail a series of decisions beginning with the aspect of partnerships that will be physically compatible, as well as standing within the general basic equal agreement, education/ understanding and self commitment to take care of another living being for a lifetime.
Join us at Desteni where we are definitely bringing to the surface the most common sensical aspects that are already here, that are being only tampered by social prejudices yet entail what is best for all, which is usually being neglected or deliberately corrupted by those that control/ manipulate the information to keep humanity in an inferiority complex that is able to be corrected for the general well being of life in this world.