What’s the word that describes the relationship between Power and Right? Righteousness. It is defined as Morally Justifiable when there is a ‘right justification’ to exert one’s will and decision to defend our Rights in a situation where they are clearly being violated or non existent which creates a struggle in the name of People’s Power = Democracy becomes a reason to retaliate against the ‘oppressors’ without understanding the consequences and outflows of doing so. This is a moral mechanism that can be adjusted to suit a power structure’s means as well, to understand how and why, suggest reading the previous entries:
Now, in our current social, economical and political crisis, it is seen as a ‘Good thing’ to defend one’s rights, and promoting any agenda under the banner of ‘democracy,’ ‘liberation’ and ‘free speech’ along with the necessary ideological impetus in order to make space for certain demands and protests to defend one’s rights, yet being unaware of what such demands can be in fact supporting and creating as a consequence on the long run. I’m talking about the point of protesting and rebelling, which is a massive cultural movement in our world-society that is willing to ‘fight to defend our rights’ while ignoring the basic aspect that ‘FIGHTING for your Rights’ implies as a benefit for the interests of those that currently hold the actual power in the system.
Revolutions like the Arab Spring and Occupy Wall Street became the way to unite people under the right to protest in means of creating an awareness of how terribly wrong is our current economic and political system, and it is not that this isn’t so, but it is certainly coming from the starting point of blaming and pointing fingers at ‘people in power’ other than looking at Self’s Responsibility within the sustenance of the machinery at all. Thus when people ‘stand up’ as in taking their arms or simply creating an opposition, it becomes an excuse for the system to generate new ways to maintain the order and control that enables our current hostile status quo with forces that seem to be about to explode, which are fueled by the sense of being the victim within the current critical conditions the majority is living in. As we see, in our current corporate capitalistic system, all possible means are being used to justify control and further evasion in people’s lives in means of security and reinstating order, this has escalated over the past years when revolutions begun hitting the streets with large numbers of people deciding that the way to create a change in our world system is through fighting and revolting. This has been discussed in this entry: 312. Are Rebellion and War the Same?
As we explained from the Documentary OBEY we can conclude that leading people to fight against the current system of power will only benefit the corporations that are eager to find reasons to implement further ‘security’ and control measures as the synthesis to the antithesis which is virtually any group or dissidence forming that is openly willing to retaliate and generate hatred toward current people in power. This means that if such movements had been in fact a threat to the stability of the current power structure, they would have been already exterminated, they haven’t, because there are interests behind the ‘revolution.’
What one can find out today is that any rebellion as an armed conflict requires Money to exist. Revolutionary movements such as in Egypt certainly required money to buy the necessary weapons to deploy the revolution. Today one can get the facts on how nations like Germany sold the weapons for the countries involved in the Arab Spring, although I would be more prone to speak of corporations and not Nations themselves, since this is now a Corporate World where Nations only stand as a conglomerate of corporate powers and laws tat enable such phenomena to be ‘acceptable.’ What does this have to do with Rebellion as a ‘Good thing to do’ in times like this?It is illegal and a criminal business to send arms to a conflict zone in German Law, and this is not being decided democratically, however the call for ‘Democracy’ in another country is accepting weapons as ‘necessary’ for the uprising – so using arms as a means to an end is suddenly fine and a good thing – this is what righteousness creates: a justified offensive in the name of liberation. Corporations are happy to sponsor such wars, people are ‘happy’ to rebel and the consequences can be read and watched here:
From the previous blog, one gets to understand how the ‘Right thing to do’ is a coercive statement that is able to trigger the experience of ‘Righteousness’ within the correct framework of interests in times of distress like now, which exists as that desire for liberation and self determination fueled by the idea of bringing down ‘corporate imperialism.’ However, what is not realized is how any form of opposition, antithesis, dissidence has been used by the system as a means to justify its upgrade for further control, further surveillance, limitations, hostility between the populace and security forces, which is what we are witnessing everywhere as your regular confrontations between the police and protestors, further laws and regulations and a CCTV reality where no one is now ‘out of cover,’ a phenomena that has escalated in the past 2 years more so than ever around the world.
Democracy has also been warped as a word that is now veiled under the premise of ‘Good’ and a ‘Noble mean’ – but is it so when funding such democratic movements implies waging war and installing new regimes controlled by foreigners? It is actually part of the Foreign Economic Policy from the major ‘Powers’ in our world system to support these insurrections, which should already indicate that there’s massive interests behind the incitation and support for people to rebel. Wars are a criminal profitable business and this means that people participating in anti-system demonstrations are contributing to benefit weapon industries, control, surveillance and further laws and restrictions to ensure people do not deviate from the current status quo. But Why do people join these movements? Because of feeling powerless to create a solution that stands equal to the power of ‘the few’ and so, joining the majority that is enraged in such powerlessness FEELS Right, this is where the retaliation toward The System’ is channeled through a collective effort wherein no one is considering the consequences of what trying to ‘create solutions’ by demanding/ protesting/opposing –in other words existing in separation and hate- will in fact generate as a consequence not only for them, but for the collective as a hole.
What’s not considered or understood by the protester is that: if such protests represented any real threat to the system, they would have been halted right away by force. This is not happening because corporations actually benefit from these movements wherein not only do they make money out of founding wars, but they can suit their interests to have a reason and excuse to intervene and ‘stop the conflict’ and present the necessary synthesis or resolution. Proof is how a Regime change such ass installing Democracy in another country became a reason for America to wage war against people’s countries, which is actually an Imperialistic tactic of course, using the Righteous banner of ‘Goodness’ to ‘Save Foreigners’ and support their ‘right to stand up to their government,’ but in reality, we must know it is not precisely how things work. You can look at how Iraq and Afghanistan are doing already after 10 years and if such support for a ‘Democracy’ was in fact beneficial to the majority. It was not. It was only an opportunity to gain control and generate wars for the sake of profit since they are funded by private corporations and not the government itself only. This is not a ‘new’ thing since Woodrow Wilson also pushed democracy as a way to establish Democracy in Europe as a way to present America as the winner and decision-making power after WWI. America happens to be a Corporatocracy, not a Democracy which should now bring 1 and 1 together to understand why Capitalism uses the same morals to justify any means to a single end where de jure, the pursuit of happiness, the individual right to Life and to own property at all cost, to be ‘Free’ is an inalienable right, de facto they are Not.
You can’t wage war without having someone to fight against, by becoming a rebel, you give the perfect reasons to reinstall order and control, as well as supplying the means – weapons – to do so. Perfect trap that everyone is falling for, you can see how many people follow Alex Jones attempt to ‘fight the system,’ while owning/ buying and promoting several weapons per capita. Why is no one looking at the obvious?
Rebellion can only worsen the conditions or furthermore, create an absolute retrocession to our current ‘civilization.’ This is an explanation of how under the right ‘moral filter,’ we can justify fighting for our rights while others can justify their own ‘rights’ through their own ‘moral filter’ which means making money out of individual’s pursuit of happiness, which means that if people have to ‘fight’ to attain that, they will use their right to maintain order and control at all cost, and this is where interests are mutually exclusive which leads to wars, just because of our inability to establish common sense as a living decision to support each other equally. Hell no, that sounds like an offense to the majority of the people, but how far can we go before we realize that we cannot get anywhere while ‘resisting’ and ‘fighting’ and generating further control out of that?
Solution :
The Means to make our living rights effective is through Political Means, Not Fighting, Debating, struggling, Complaining, Blaming, taking Revenge, shouting, getting guns or drop out of the system, you can only become part of the Problem within such stance.This is about Taking Self Responsibility for the system we have all co-created and understanding that our Rights won’t be individualized needs and preferences above another’s interests, Rights imply Self Responsibility which is why individualism within equality means ensuring Every single living being is having Equal Support to Live in dignity, to have access to the best water, food, education, professions and jobs that we commit ourselves to as a means to contribute to maintain the system in a successful manner, building and constructing places to live, to work and study that honor the lives of those that currently have nowhere to live in, no food to eat, no ‘right’ to defend either since they will exist as a de facto agreement in our system and way of living.
The Solution is Education, understanding How the System works to clearly see how we have all been collectively responsible for our current living conditions.
We support Equal Rights for all to Live in Dignity and this is a political statement, not a means to retaliate and wage war with and this is the foundation of Equal Money Capitalism: Equal Rights = Equal Responsibilities as an economic, political and social system where each person counts and is counted on.
Rewards :
Responsibilities ennoble the individual, and this is what Living in Equality implies, no more will we ever have to ‘Fight for our rights’ but instead work to make our living right sustainable and viable as the result of our decision to Live as Equals in a world where no person hates another, no one feels abused, violated or cheated will be the implementation of a society based on trust and fraternity, on an actual freedom that will consider another as yourself in every single moment.
For further reference, read the Equal Money Wiki
-
Place your questions as the Equal Money Forum and Equal Money Capitalism at Quora
-
Visit the Group Capitalism vs. Equal Money group on Facebook.
-
Read the Equal Money Wiki
-
Read Economist’s Journey to Life
No More Conflicts – May 2011, MUAC – México City
Blogs:
- Day 310: The Children of the Law of One (Part Three)
- Reincarnation: Recycling Beings for Heaven’s Profit (Part 2): DAY 311
- From Spirit to Body to Mind…back to Spirit – the Cycle of Karma – Continued
Watch:
MarlenLife's Blog 